EDITORIAL: New
books create new headaches
Its that time of year, again. We couldnt wait for Christmas break to come and end the 16-week chain of papers, projects, exams, and staring at the clock during lectures. The final exams came and went and so did book-buy-back, leaving many of us with empty pockets and a backpack full of books we couldnt wait to be rid of. What exactly is the problem with these companies that publish these textbooks that come out with a new edition every two years. Do things like basic mathematics, history, and British and American literature really change so dramatically that every two years, a "new" textbook is necessary? |
|
BURN BABY
BURN: |
Upon inspection of these "new" textbooks we found that the only real difference is that the chapters are shuffled into a different order, and a snappy new cover is added. These upgrades add little, if any, new information to what are primarily traditional teachings. Things like Shakespeare havent changed in over four hundred years, but for some reason we keep buying copy after copy hidden by a new index or glossary format.
Who do we have to blame for such an atrocity? The IVCC bookstore? Though it may seem easy to forward your hatred to the cashier that just emptied your wallet, keep in mind that the bookstore doesnt crank those books out of a press in the back room; they get them from publishing companies.
These companies only earn profits from the initial sale of the book. They dont turn a constant profit if the same amount of books stay in circulation; they make their money from those "new" books, making the current edition obsolete.
Those old books are still useful; they can be used for lining the bottom of a bird cage, or leveling an uneven table. As some college students demonstrated after making an unsuccessful attempt to return their textbooks, the books can be used as firewood (See photo, page 4).